Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +4234%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy