Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1260MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +1525%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
7424
32
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA103
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
22 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy