Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +1100%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
7680
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy