Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +2190%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy