Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +1382%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy