Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +352%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
384
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT215
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy