Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +1994%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
34W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G96
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy