Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +5538%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G86
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy