Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +398%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU117
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy