Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +40%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
247W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy