Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +380%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK110
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy