Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +17%
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy