Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +1408%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy