Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 51W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
NV43
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy