Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +14%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
336
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy