Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 171W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +111%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G80
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy