Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +17%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
189W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy