CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
+17%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
VS
Quadro FX 5800
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
189W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
7
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
8
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
10
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy