Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +187%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy