Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded +809%
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy