Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050 +40%
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy