Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 24GB VRAM Tesla P10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P10 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (694.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla P10 +1464%
11.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1025 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
694.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
143.3 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
358.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
179.2 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.47 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy