Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +9066%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy