Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +2401%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy