NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+643%
4.252 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
Quadro M5000
+1006%
332
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro M5000
+625%
87
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM204
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
