Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +2328%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
384
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA100
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy