Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 55W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
NV43
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
31W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy