Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K100

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 1 years late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +75%
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy