NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
+75%
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
