NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

VS

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (55W vs 260W)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1560MHz

More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro K2000M

0.572 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +2413%

14.38 TFLOPS

Quadro K2000M

VS

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Graphics Card

Jun 2012

Release Date

Aug 2018

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1305 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

900 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

24GB

DDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

384bit

28.80GB/s

Bandwidth

672.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

72

-

Compute Units

-

384

Shading Units

4608

32

TMUs

288

16

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

576

-

RT Cores

72

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

256 KB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

149.8 GPixel/s

23.84 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

449.3 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

28.75 TFLOPS

572.2 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

14.38 TFLOPS

23.84 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107

GPU Name

TU102

N14P-Q3-A2

GPU Variant

TU102-875-A1

Kepler

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.27 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

118 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Board Design

55W

TDP

260W

-

Suggested PSU

600 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

-

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

1.3

3.0

CUDA

7.5

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

2

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor

3

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

4

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

5

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

7

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8

8

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

9

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6

10

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance