NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+1648%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU102
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
