Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +694%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G96C
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy