Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +779%
5.032 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro P3200 Max Q +148%
87
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro P3200 Max Q +608%
85
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy