Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +615%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy