Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded +1065%
6.664 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
RTX A1000 Embedded +3605%
1297
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy