Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 24GB VRAM Tesla M40 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1112MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla M40 24 GB +1094%
6.832 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Tesla M40 24 GB +1265%
478
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Maxwell
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
948 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1112 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.8 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.832 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM200
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM200-895-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy