Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +177%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy