Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +2047%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy