Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 68W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy