Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +131%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
189W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy