Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +87%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200 +225%
127
Quadro K2100M
39
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
576
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy