Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1165MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile +231%
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy