Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +31%
1.894 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200
121
Quadro P1000 +7%
130
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200 +3%
33
Quadro P1000
32
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy