Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1733MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 +516%
8.873 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
640
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy