Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +110%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy