Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1124MHz vs 824MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Tesla K80 +185%
4.113 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Tesla K80 +193%
373
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Tesla K80 +82%
62
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2496
40
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK210
-
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.7
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy