Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M +161%
0.854 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy