Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +177%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy