Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +733%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy