Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +7080%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy