Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
8640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe +4048%
31.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
9216
48
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy